The ability to provide public leadership or create a surrounding that favors it is an essential and central part of any individual who holds a community office. The role and functions of a public front-runner enable him or her to navigate through their duties while at the same time solving challenges that comes with the role. Whether a business entity or a public office, public leadership boils down to the qualities of the person who is to perform the role of a public leader (Cherry, & Jacob, 2016). In fact, their qualities and character go into shaping the roles and duties they perform on daily basis. In other words, public leadership does not stay in the confines of a community office but is applicable to other sections of the society including medical institutions, depending on how the individual holding the post executes their post.
Ethical failures have normally pointed to either leaders themselves or their leadership styles. Examination of a leader is done through the manner in which they decide to implement their duties. When it comes to set4ing a good example, the leaders are the mirrors through which other people judge their ethical standards from. For instances when a leader arrives early at an event, the other people are more likely to follow suit and come early (Patient Engagement, 2019). A Leader has a duty of maintaining acceptable ethics and bears the results of the standards he or she upholds. Communicating ethical standards through a leader shapes the opinion of their people under him and gives them a role model to whom they look up for mentorship. An ethical leadership style gives out many positive outcomes unlike especially from a leader. An ethical administrator implies that he or she goes beyond the usual good guy picture. A goo leader makes ethical his first agenda and models it through his work ethic. In addition, they incorporate the ethical culture in ever function they carry out. For instance, while filing up posts and operations that need administrative system of the firm they should apply ethical standards. Rewarding ethical behaviors form other employees motivates.
A leader should have both technical and teamwork capabilities hence each morning he ro she writes a to- do-list (Julian et.al, 2019). First, the leader coordinates various factors relevant to the situation. More so, he or she can make many workers achieve a single objective. In other words, creating cohesion among people enables a quick way of countering the emergency hence cohesion makes decision making of a leader effective.
According to the behavioral theory needs vary depending on the disaster at hand. The objective of any leader is reduction of an emergency from graduating into something more catastrophic and unmanageable (Julian et.al, 2019). The leader can control an emergency by defining the problems and identify the needs in line with the context of the incident. For example, in case of a fire, the immediate need is evacuating the building using the emergency exit. The second requirement is containing the fire from spreading. In terms of management, a leader has to deploy resources, according to finances or human labor. Resources indirectly provide the support needed to manage a disaster. Some researchers are of the opinion that strategies without resources are not workable. Thus, strategies go hand in hand with resources.
The ability to put things into order and clear perspective might come naturally or after some practice. Enforcing instructions and meet the necessary essentials within the time limit permitted (Cherry, & Jacob, 2016). For instance, a leader should ensure all assignments are attended for the sake of time management. In addition, stating goals is not sufficient enough. An effective leader has to go an extra mile and ensure they map goals with actions. Simplifying a goal within a group of people creates a sense of purpose rather than an uphill task. Simplified goals create thousands of possibilities easing off pressure within the group. For example, working hard is an objective but delegating of duties simplifies work and improves on work ethic of the leaders and his or her followers.
Leadership is not hereditary and thus one cannot be a leader from birth. Some may argue that the exposure to leadership positions at a young age sets one into a leadership path, early in their lives (Cherry, & Jacob, 2016). However, exposure is not equal to attaining successful leadership. History has enough examples of people who failed to leave up to expectations although they were leaders from an early onset. Although all of the above may be true, leaders are made; it is fact that stands undebated for centuries. People do not have qualities that make them leaders from birth. In fact, leaders learn a lot from their day-to-day activities, which later shape their perspectives and decisions on various matters. On the other hand, enrolling to a program does not automatically make one a leader. Making a leader means that a person is willing to learn. Some people succeed and give out good results after learning while others fail. Therefore coupled with proper management skills ensure one get ahead of his time and reap the benefits of all qualities encompassing a leader.
Reference
Cherry, B., & Jacob, S. R. (2016). Contemporary nursing: Issues, trends, & management. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Julian, J. F. E., Manalo, C. B., & Estiva, E. A. (2019). Using Images to Elicit Leadership and Management in Nursing Praxis: A Photovoice Research.
Patient Engagement (2019). Health IT Playbook. https://www.healthit.gov/playbook/patient-engagement/
