Edudorm Facebook

Motivational and Transformational Perceptions of Women with Felony Histories Reentry after Incarceration

  Motivational and Transformational Perceptions of Women with Felony Histories Reentry after Incarceration

 

Section 5:  Methodology Details

5.1 Purpose of the Study

            The purpose of this generic qualitative study is to understand the experience of reintegration of women with felony histories after incarceration for drug related offenses. The research literature regarding women with felony histories indicates that women with felony histories experience difficulty accessing community resources to help them bridge the gap from incarceration to productive citizens and about two-thirds of them are rearrested within three years of their release (Cuellar & Cheema, 2012). Women with felony histories experience challenges associated with their criminal past instead of society embracing them as reformed colleagues (Baur et al. 2018). Woman with felony histories also have to indoor the social stigmas placed on them as they reintegrate into their perspective communities (Brand, 2016) as well as experience the negative attitudes of many in society (Rade, Desmarais, & Mitchell, 2016). The more grievous the crime the more difficult the integration will be (Jason, Olson & Harvey, 2015).The research literature is limited regarding internal experiences of women with felony histories. The literature does not address women with felony histories perceptions of what motivated them to change and key factors that played a role in their transformation for successful community reentry creating a gap in the literature and a need for this study. Van & Esther (2015) suggested that woman with felony histories who have a positive mindset upon release from prison will have a better opportunity to successfully reintegrate back into society.

            Exploring women with felony histories and how they perceive the motivational and transformational factors that helped them on the path to successful community reentry will provide a clear understanding of the issues and challenges woman with felony histories face and how they overcome these issues and challenges for a successful reentry. This study will also provide new knowledge for criminal justice administrators, policy makers, and stakeholders associated with the transition process of women with felony histories (Zakaras, 2012). This study will allow professional to fix, create, and implement new laws or strategies within the prison system, reentry programs, community and other supports networks to better assist woman with felony histories during their transition for prison to their community for a successful reentry. This study will also bring hope to other women with felony histories that maybe experiencing the same issues reintegrating after incarceration.

            Understanding the individual specific and setting explicit qualities, factors, and encounters that add to the fruitful reemergence of these women into the public, from their points of view, may help the improvement of projects or approaches for women, pertinent to the reintegration cycle (William, 2015). Since women with felony history are individuals from the population of interest, they have novel perceptions of knowledge in their encounters. They are best at clarifying how they explored those encounters and the elements that made them successful (Brand, 2016). While investigating women with felony history views, we will examine with them topics identified with inspirational components, defensive variables, and boundaries to progress (Battle, 2019). Even though convict criminology customarily alludes to scholastics' insightful work with individual narratives of imprisonment, it also speaks to a developing viewpoint in the field of adjustments and criminology that contends for the supremacy of ethnographic strategies. In this chapter, the paper examines the examination plan and rationale, the researcher's role, the study methodology, population and sample, sampling procedures, data collection procedures, interview questions and field testing, the trustworthiness of the study, and data collection analysis procedures.

5.2 Research Methodology

Selection rationality for participant

           Study members will be women with felony history and who are beyond 18 years old and have served at least nine months in a state or government jail or prison. They should not have any record of arrest for three years since the release, and who had not come back to jail or prison as the aftereffect of a technical violation during that time. Any women with felony history who served less than nine months will be ineligible for support. Members will be solicited to offer a clarification from detainment and detainment history to decide qualification. 

           Purposive sampling will be utilized in qualitative research to increase detailed data from a particular population (Percy & Kostere, 2015). Purposive sampling will be used to recognize women with felony history who will match for the examination dependent on gender, age, and imprisonment history. Members will be enrolled through two Community Supervision and Corrections Departments, and one church in North Texas (Battle, 2019). Flyers publicizing the examination will be posted in all areas. Interested women with felony history will be given chance to send messages or call the research group for enrolment purposes. A letter will be sent to the potential women with felony history clarifying the examination, which will incorporate clarification of measures. Members will return consent forms directly to the research group rather than replace them in churches or management administration offices. 

           The sample size will be controlled by how rapidly engagement will be reached during the information assortment measure. Engagement is where increasing more data does not yield new data (Richards & Hemphill, 2018). Scientists differ on the ideal example size in phenomenological studies (Jason, Olson & Harvey, 2015). For this investigation, the objective sample size will be 10, or until saturation is reached. 

Instrumentation 

           A semi-organized interview convention will be created depending on the two exploration inquiries in the research. Sub questions and follow-up questions will be remembered for the meeting guide to give guidance during interviews. Telephonic semi-organized meetings will be led to increase a total comprehension of the encounters of members. Research has demonstrated that members feel greater when giving a talk by telephone than face to face (William, 2015). The namelessness provided by not having the option to see the questioner may prompt more elevated solace levels with unveiling comparative data. All calls will be sound recorded so they can later be translated. Members will be educated that their meetings ought to be registered before they assented to partake. Interviews will last for 50 and 80 minutes to permit adequate time for panels to be finished and to guarantee that members completely comprehend the inquiries, just as to urge them to expound on answers that may be obscure or confounding. One meeting will be directed to every member. Following the record, the examination group will investigate and code the information to distinguish topics. 

            Different analysts have utilized semi-organized meetings and center gatherings to investigate subjects identified with the reemergence cycle (William, 2015). They directed semi-organized encounters with women to explore their impression of monetary boundaries to reemergence achievement. Larsen (2017) likewise utilized semi-organized meetings. However, they met the two people concerning their image of what makes wrongdoers fruitful after delivery and elements that may fill in as boundaries to progress after birth. William (2014) directed semi-organized meetings to investigate similarly develops yet utilized just women with felony history as members. Additionally, semi-organized sessions will be used in this research with only female members. Using this kind of instrumentation will take into account detailed clarification of women with felony history experiences and prompt a more profound comprehension of those encounters.

5.3 Population and Sample

            An essential initial phase in any study is recognizing and selecting the examination population (Taherdoost, 2016). In such a manner, Out-care's ability to coordinate and contribute will be essential to this research, particularly considering the trouble related to finding and selecting jail and the woman with felony history who has been released (Garland & Hass, 2015). Out-care's residency as one of American driving specialist corporation for detainees and delivered detainees will be the premise of choice to approach Out-care for the motivations behind exploration, perceiving the association's critical and long commitments to the help and backing of detainees. Contact will at first be made with Out-care, in regards to the possibility of detainee discharge research. Following a gathering with the administration, who maintained the significance of American based female-explicit examination in the territory of detainee discharge, the specialist will be allowed admittance to Out-care's Women's Program as a road for exploration and member enlistment. 

           With the administration uphold, the members' enrollment in this task will be assisted by the Women's Program case manager(s), who furnished a method for initial contact with customers and likely members (Garland & Hass, 2015). Help with this region will include different exercises that will be completed by the researcher, including verbally educating women with felony history regarding the exploration venture. The process will as well comprise of giving datasheets, supporting investment in 'follow up' interviews as a method for 'meet-and-welcome' to women with felony history who will be participating in the research. The process will include recognizing the individuals who communicated enthusiasm for taking part in the research and delivering contact subtleties to the specialist. With this help, the researchers will then be ready to contact women with felony history legitimately to officially welcome them to taking part in the research, both intentionally and secretly, and further, to make courses of action for a meeting, if they decide to be a piece of the exploration venture. 

           Altogether, eleven members will be selected during an extensive enlistment period. On occasion, the process of ensuring interview take place requires persistence, with various resulting rescheduling. On different occasions, members will be more unconstrained, offering their time from the start contact.

5.4 Sampling Procedures

           The research method will comprise ten women with felony history, enrolled basically from the Women's Program, with the leading standard for determination being founded on the person's ability to participate in the examination venture (Richards & Hemphill, 2018). Eight of the ten women with felony history will be enlisted in the program legitimately using the researcher’s presentation or referral, while two will be enrolled through the snowballing technique. The other three women will be selected for the participants with no history associated with the women’s group. Even though the example size might be seen as reasonably unassuming, it will be profound comprehension allowed by data-rich cases (Taherdoost, 2016). It will be of an incentive to the personal item, and besides, it is the sign of all qualitative requests (Dadashazar, 2017). Nearly, by engaging a small number of women with felony history to participate in the research will give a clear and quick understanding to their experience in the society after their release (Delice, 2010). Further, the quality of information to be obtained from the interview will assist in theoretical saturation while taking into account the itemized examination of the information requested in the study. 

           For the motivations behind building up a comprehension of specific example qualities, all the ten participants will be interviewed to gather demographic and background information that might help demonstrate the last analysis (William, 2015). Of the ten women with felony history, one will be Caucasian, five African-American, and four Hispanic. Ages ran from 26 years to 48 years with an average age of 37 years.  Even though questions concerning real offenses and additional charges will be excluded from the interview plan, these will be considered revealed by every one of the interviewees all through the meeting cycle. Among the ten women, offenses notwithstanding one driving without a permit, one ambush, one disturbed outfitted theft, five medication-related charges including selling and providing, and two taking and thievery charges. For six of the ten members, this will be their first contact with the criminal equity framework (Rade, Desmarais & Mitchell, 2016).

5.5 Data Collection Procedures

            The members will be selected and met for this investigation began not many months before the examination date (Englander, 2012). The flyer will be shown at three reemergence programs in Western State. The information assortment measure started in the wake of affirming the Letters of Cooperation from the three reemergence locales. From the start, with the primary contact of the women with felony history to be selected will concur and agree to meet in the interview day. The following day, at another reemergence program where flyers for the examination will be presented, people will concur to participate in an exploration study. Seven members will be screened in an individual who all met the rules, and each agreed to meet on the spot. At one reemergence program, it will take two days to talk with six members: the most recent information assortment day, three members who finished the information assortment measure to be met. 

           At all reemergence offices, up close and personal meetings will be led with ten women with felony history at three diverse reemergence programs in the city. Every woman with felony history will give a duplicate of the forms for taking place in the interview before the interview occurred (Chidlow et al., 2015). The process will assist in evaluating concentrate with every member to ensure that the individual comprehends the reason for the study and permit them to pose any inquiries before beginning the interview. Interview will take minimum time possible form one person to another it will take at least 15 to 30 minutes. A few members will be engaged in an interview in a more extended time than others. All women with felony history will be expected to finish the full session without pulling back or avoiding any inquiries questions. 

           Every woman with felony history will attend the interview once where a recording device will be utilized for each meeting to record the entire session, while answers shorthand will likewise be recorded. The reason to use this kind of criteria is to ensure that all non-verbal communication and physical articulations when posed specific inquiries were taken. At every reintegration office, the offices will be private. After each meeting, analyst will educate members after they deciphered the meetings where a duplicate of the interview will be sent to them. Each verbatim session will be interpreted manually written from the outset, at that point composed in Microsoft word archive and spared in information assortment organizer secret phrase ensured and streak drive as a reinforcement. 

           The information assortment measure, introduced will be a little extraordinary when gathering the information and doing the hands-on work (Rade, Desmarais & Mitchell, 2016). For example, at first, it will be expressed that five reemergence programs will be chosen. In any case, when it came to doing the exploration concentrate, just three reemergence programs will consent to take an interest in the investigation (Gilbert & Elley, 2015). Likewise, the first number of members will be extending from 6 to 10. Anyway, there will be a sum of ten members for the examination, which will be more than anticipated. Having more members enhances my test (Richards & Hemphill, 2018). Another will be the flyers posted at every reemergence program, which will uniquely take up for a couple of days and by returning individuals needed to be met that day. Subsequently, of those anxious to partake in the research study, scientists will be inquired about whether they could utilize one of their private rooms, office, or gathering space to begin setting up to direct the interview meetings where women with felony will meet that day. Every member will be informed that the interview will be recorded but one can stop it at any time. The meeting convention will comprise 12 inquiries posed by the members that every reaction (Kahlke, 2014). The meetings of the staff part's meeting convention will include five queries. 

5.6 Guiding Interview Questions and Field Testing

           The study and meeting guide will be changed rendition of the instruments utilized in William, (2015) investigation. Researchers will add few inquiries to give data on women' association in crime with companions or personal accomplices. Scientist likewise included inquiries regarding women with felony history earlier and current associations with their children and the effect women with felony history imprisonment had on their children. Before concluding the overview and meeting guide, specialist will be asked to pre-try the draft instrument with two of the past imprisoned women with felony history to watch the time it took to finish and to distinguish questions that they thought may cause inconvenience (Kahlke, 2014). Pre-testing the instrument end up being priceless in focusing on focal zones of the exploration that the women with felony history will distinguish as significant, which will be added to a more extensive comprehension of previous and current female guilty parties' general existence. 

Interview survey 

           Each interview meeting will start with the fulfillment of a broad study instrument. Researchers will read each question to the participating women with felony history and conclude their reactions. The agency will gather general segment and enlightening data, including the scope of inquiries concerning women with felony history physical and emotional well-being status, their exploitation accounts, their inclusion in wrongdoing, their substance addictions, just as treatment, private, and custodial encounters (Bansal, Smith & Vaara, 2018). Women with felony history will gave some information about their familial and friend connections, just as their association in crime. Analyst likewise will ask women with felony history on inquiries about their latest involvement in the criminal equity framework, the difficulties they looked upon reemergence to society, and the level of fulfillment they had with the advancement they made upon their last delivery from jail. In the study, analysts will concentrate on looking at the effect of pre-imprisonment, in-jail, and post-jail encounters on detained and paroled women. 

In-depth interview

           The survey will give pattern data to the information gathered in the in-depth interview. Researcher s will illustrate from women with felony history review reactions to manage the discussion during the in-depth interview meeting. The entirety of the sessions will be recorded utilizing an advanced voice recorder and will regularly be completed at the same time as the study (Johnson & Rowlands, 2012). These meetings will be the essential information analyst will illustrate from venture to pick up knowledge into women with felony history understandings of their encounters identifying with reemergence, recidivism, arranged in their records of the unique situation and conditions on with Kennedy (2016). Analyst objective in utilizing in-depth interview meeting methods to give the women wide scope in depicting their broad session of the difficulties they looked as they progressed from jail to the network, permitting women's comprehension of these issues to develop inductively. Furthermore, the utilization of stories gives a contextualized awareness also to pick up knowledge concerning recidivism explanations, just as the cycle used to stop from wrongdoing. 

Guiding interview questions 

           RQ1: What are the lived encounters of effective reintegration as a woman with felony        history, during, and after imprisonment that impacted triumphant reemergence into the      community? 

           RQ2: What methods for dealing with stress or characteristics do women with felony          history feel were critical to their effective reemergence to the public? 

           RQ3: What are the significance, importance, and valuation of the Women's Program to      the women with felony history? 

           RQ4: What sorts of post-discharge issues do women with felony history face following     delivery from jail? What types and blends of administration do they see as necessary or      of a specific value intending to these issues?

5.7 Other Data Collection Procedures

           From the above information, further collection methodology will be engaged in with the final goal of the investigation. The interview addressing women with lawful offense history will be to increase comprehension of their encounters with the reintegration cycle, how their interest with reemergence programs assists them with reintegrating again into society. Has reemergence upheld administrations help with their necessities and difficulties these people face (Englander, 2012). Women with felony history will be told to recount their story; every member will alright with the researcher and they will be ready to share their reemergence encounters (Kahlke, 2014). Then again, their conversation with staff individuals will be diverse, specifically getting some information about subsidizing, how they reach customers, the extent of fruitful results, and troubles. 

           The aftereffects of the information gathered will be important for the research as it will uncover in-depth details of women with felony reintegration cycle and their perspective (Brand, 2016). The meetings will be recorded after finishing the information assortment measure. This will make it simpler to follow along and composed. To delineate the interview,  meeting paper will contain the following details; woman with felony history first name and ID code with recorded number, implying that the principal recording with envelope document put away number after that follow the grouping all together. 

           During the record cycle to about fourteen days to interpret, the researcher will be engaged in listening each recorded meeting to record the same words said during the conference (Johnson & Rowlands, 2012). Tuning in to the member's voice, recognizing every member's face will be evident to the scientist, their non-verbal communication, and physical appearances interpreting their meetings (Richards & Hemphill, 2018). Explicit remarks will feature them and critical explanations applicable to the examination questions. Notwithstanding tuning in to the account, every member's feelings will be recognized as those who will be serious, who will give short reactions. Such reactions felt will be doing something to be thankful for being included and helping other people who may be after them. Examples and topics will be perceived while interpreting as well. The information immersion will be accomplished from the ten women with felony history with likenesses in their accomplishment in the reemergence cycle and backing administrations post-detainment.

5.8 Proposed Data Analysis

            Qualitative information may comprise of sound recordings, transcribed notes, or meeting outlines (Gilbert & Elley, 2015). The information gathered can be as perplexing as the lives of people from whom data will be collected. At the point when analysts code their examination, they are catching the quintessence of the information (Bansal, Smith & Vaara, 2018). Two rounds of coding will occur in the wake of finishing information assortment. In the first round, elucidating coding will permit the specialist, to sum up, the interview essential subjects. In the second round of coding, design coding will be done to search for the information designs. Classes will be distinguished by figuring out which coded things have a place together in families or gatherings (Kahlke, 2014). Now, topics will start to rise in the information. It will lay the foundation for cross-talk with the investigation. Information assortment and examination will stop after arriving at immersion (Gilbert & Elley, 2015). As per Gilbert & Elley (2015), immersion is the point reached while acquiring new information does not yield new data. 

           The information plan is to get inside and out data from reemergence program members and staff individuals to respond precisely to the exploration questions. The information investigation measure used subjective information examination programming to decipher interviews. Gathering, arranging and examining information utilizing a codebook made by the analyst will be used to assist in keeping information protected and secure (Baur et al., 2018). Nvivo programming will be used during the record cycle transferred information to create subjects and examples for coding ID developing outcomes and discoveries. Even though subjective programming enables code to compose and sort data, analysts will still have to enter research information line by line to produce data.

           Recorded meetings will be interpreted verbatim complete of all total record. All records will be transferred into programming for investigation; the information will then be examined utilizing applied topical examination coding cycles (Ndrecka, 2014). The analyst will apply essential coding, which will as well be used to recognize the inquiries questions and react to the answers. The inductive information will produce subjects and examples characterized as an expression or sentence that acknowledges what information implies (Ndrecka, 2014). The illustrative words and phrases will be featured running inquiry wizard distinguish rehashed designs through content pursuit, word recurrence, and coding correlation. It will allow the specialist to determine classifications to different topics developed, such as instruction-level, psychological treatment, occupations, vagrancy, probation officer, available help, compensation, reemergence, temperance, well-being net, and renewed opportunities attitude, condition, obligation, and responsibility. This topic speaks to the importance and accounts of a person's understanding. There will be no discrepant cases recognized. The distinguished coding references will be remarked with printed portrayals for 345 subjects (Kahlke, 2014). Just fourteen realized because of time narrowing, which brought about gathering reports for those joined fourteen topics. 

           The investigation will start with open coding, which will include scanning the information for rising ideas and rehashing thoughts (Charmaz, 2017). Steady with existing exploration once concepts will be distinguished, the data will be isolated into combined records that incorporates the accompanying: measures into medicating action, efforts into crime, detainment encounters, reemergence difficulties, and obstructions, factors are prompting reintegration achievement and disappointments, purposes behind recidivating, sparks for resistance, and strategies for removing pathways from wrongdoing. In each document, the story that will be identified with different classifications will be copied. To encourage a similar investigation, separate records for every sort will be made for both previous and current women with felony history. The specialist will assess each dataset for topical examples while taking note of likenesses and contrasts that will arise. Each record will be broken down seriously to look for new developing ideas and connections. For every principle classification, specialist will led research underlying examination of remanded women with felony history records independently. After that, deliberate reviews will be made to look for covering and certain subjects between the two examples of gatherings.

5.9 Role of the Researcher

           Yukhnenko, Blackwood & Fazel (2019) expressed that qualitative researchers focus on profundity instead of broadness, which deciphers additionally understanding exact circumstances and people in a specific population. Using a subjective ethnography approach works best because the scientist can do inside and out hands-on work to catch the reemergence program's general viability and scope of members' encounters and results (Garland & Hass, 2015). Garland & Hass (2015) indicated that personal exploration requires abilities, preparation, knowledge, and capacities. Nonetheless, the examination will utilize diagnostic insight and style considering that there are no relations with any of the women with felony history participant, which will stay proficient throughout the entire exploration measure. 

           The examination group will then be answerable for questioner and information authority. Utilizing a solitary questioner forestalls variety in talk with style and information assortment strategies (Simon, 2011). The researcher's job will be to create inquiries questions, meet every member, and test further into member answers to increase a full comprehension of members' discernments. Subsequent to finishing information assortment, the scientist's job will be to code and decipher the information. After reference, for example, affirmation predisposition and culture predisposition can possibly modify information during assortment and understanding (Gilbert & Elley, 2015). Information assorting will be utilized to abstain from affecting the members' clarifications of the marvels with my encounters. Organizing is finished prevent contemplations, impressions, and sentiments as notes while recording or dissecting information to perceive any close to home impacts of the analyst that may change information assortment or examination (Kristofferson, White & Peloza, 2014). Reflexivity is the consistent evaluation and consciousness of individual positions, convictions, and predispositions during the exploration cycle (Creswell, 2013). Reflexivity will be kept up all through the process, trying to guarantee the virtue of information gathered. Even though people who will be recently detained will be directed, any people who will be previous customers of the exploration will not be met to evade predisposition or any force awkwardness, though much as could be expected. 

           The researcher's job in this examination will be gathering information and investigating the discoveries from the information to be gathered. The specialist directs semi-organized meetings with the ten women with felony history participants at the reemergence programs that are selected for the study. Notwithstanding being a decent audience, analysts additionally will watch the women with felony history associations with staff individuals and one another. The analyst will be entitled to maintain a direct conversation with members during the meeting cycle. The inquiry questions will be open-finished so the members can offer a point by point response. The specialist will use a manual to follow in succession and to have follow-up questions when it appears to be that the interviewee needs to state more (Gilbert & Elley, 2015). The specialist needs to manufacture a bond with members to create trust. Subsequently, the specialist must be a specialist on the topic of reemergence projects and cycle. The analyst's experience, preparation, aptitudes, and credibility fortify their situation in the examination. 

           To guarantee legitimacy and validity, the scientist must ensure their members' investigation (Eriksson & Kovalainen, 2015). Assuring that the information and data gathered will be securely stored away, and just the scientist approached. The last job of the scientist in this investigation will be the remaining spotlight on the undertaking ahead. To foresee any difficulties that may show up during the exploration study, to have a strategy to address the problems because while managing human subjects, they are unusual. Researchers must be the comprehension of the member's circumstance and make sure to show restraint due to somethings possibly out of their control.

5.10 Credibility, Dependability, and Transferability

Credibility

           In subjective examinations, credibility alludes to inside legitimacy. Credibility is generally associated with instrumentation and information in a personal report (Graneheim & Lundman, 2004). From the instrument utilized, it should be conceivable to attract significant data identified with the exploration addresses presented (Battle, 2019). For the reasons for this investigation, believability will be set up through immersion and part checking. Part checks will be utilized to guarantee the information recorded (Grafton, Lillis, Ihantola & Kihn, 2011). Members will be asked whether the analyst missed or confounded any data accumulated from their meetings before the information investigation started. Checking in with members will kill the chance of misjudging or forgetting about data that may apply to the examination. Immersion is arrived at when no new data is being found (Anney, 2014). Reflexivity will likewise be kept up all through the cycle to keep away from analyst predisposition. 

Dependability 

           Instituting dependability expects scientists to have a sensible clarification for the strategy for information assortment and that the information gathered is predictable with this clarification (Cope, 2014). The data assembled must answer the examination questions inquired. Having the option to review the examination cycle and the specialist's activities and impacts likewise assist with building up reliability in an investigation (Richards & Hemphill, 2018). Making the exploration cycle straightforward to different analysts considers deciding the dependability of techniques utilized and ends. A review trail of the means taken to direct this investigation will be kept up for this reason. 

Transferability 

           In subjective examinations, transferability alludes to outside legitimacy. Variety in member determination will guarantee that a decent cross-area of the population is informed (Anney, 2014). Members will be enrolled through remedial management workplaces in two districts situated in North Texas, and through a massive church in the zone. The central section will be a provincial region, comprised of a few unassuming communities. The next part will generally include thickly populated rural areas of Dallas, Texas, with a couple of rustic towns toward the north of the region. The congregation that will be utilized for member enlistment will be situated in North Texas and has a different assemblage (Cope, 2014). The thick depiction will be used to build the extravagance and unpredictability of the examination. Member reactions will be investigated and deciphered in a manner that didn't bypass the subject in a shallow manner yet will study profound into the significance of the experience itself.

 

 

 

References

Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at             trustworthiness criteria.

 Bansal, P., Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1189-1195. doi:10.5465/amj.2018.4004

Battle, M. V. (2019). The Lived Experience of African Americans that Transition from Prison to Society Who Become Entrepreneurs (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix).

Baur, J. E., Hall, A. V., Daniels, S. R., Buckley, M. R., & Anderson, H. J. (2018). Beyond            banning the box: A conceptual model of the stigmatization of ex-offenders in the          workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 204-219.           https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/job.2279

Brand, S. (2016). Lived experiences of reintegration: A study of how former prisoners      experienced reintegration in a local context (Doctoral dissertation).

Charmaz, K. (2017). The power of constructivist grounded theory for critical inquiry. Qualitative             inquiry, 23(1), 34-45. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1077800416657105.

Chidlow, A., Ghauri, P. N., Yeniyurt, S., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2015). Establishing rigor in mail-      survey procedures in international business research. Journal of world business50(1),     26-35.

Cope, D. G. (2014, January). Methods and meanings: credibility and trustworthiness of    qualitative research. In Oncology nursing forum (Vol. 41, No. 1).

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach.             Sage Publications, Incorporated.

Dadashazar, N. (2017). Offender recidivism: A quantitative study of motivational risk factors      and counseling. Retrieved from:   https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/       &httpsredir=1&article=4863&context=dissertations

Delice, A. (2010). The Sampling Issues in Quantitative Research. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice10(4), 2001-2018.

Englander, M. (2012). The interview: Data collection in descriptive phenomenological human     scientific research. Journal of phenomenological psychology43(1), 13-35.

Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2015). Qualitative methods in business research: A practical        guide to social research. Sage. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Yv-            ICwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=practical+implications+when+conducting+research            &ots=MLvnDu0B2Q&sig=Y85CiCR0t9iA7O1V2Vse4k1E5uo&redir_esc=y#v=onepage            &q=practical%20implications%20when%20conducting%20research&f=false.

 Price-Tucker, A., Zhou, A., Charroux, A., Tenzin, C., Robertson, E., Abdalla, H., & Escalante,   T. (2019). Successful reentry: a community-level analysis. The Harvard University    Institute of Politics: Criminal Justice Policy Group.

Garland, B. E., & Hass, A. Y. (2015). An outcome evaluation of a Mid-western prisoner reentry initiative. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(3), 293-314.      doi:10.1177/0887403413514438

Gilbert J, and Elley B.( 2015) Reducing recidivism: an evaluation of the pathway total      reintegration programme. New Zealand Sociology;30(4):15–37.

Grafton, J., Lillis, A. M., Ihantola, E. M., & Kihn, L. A. (2011). Threats to validity and reliability            in mixed methods accounting research. Qualitative Research in Accounting &           Management.

Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research:          concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education         today24(2), 105-112.

Jason, L. A., Olson, B. D., & Harvey, R. (2015). Evaluating alternative aftercare models for ex-            offenders. Journal of drug issues, 45(1), 53-68.

Johnson, J. M., & Rowlands, T. (2012). The interpersonal dynamics of in-depth     interviewing. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 99-     113.

Kahlke, R. M. (2014). Generic qualitative approaches: Pitfalls and benefits of methodological             mixology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 37-52. DOI             10.1177/160940691401300119

Kennedy, D. M. (2016). Is it any clearer? Generic qualitative inquiry and the VSAIEEDC model of data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 21(8), 1369-1379.

Kristofferson, K., White, K., & Peloza, J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social         observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial           action. Journal of Consumer Research40(6), 1149-1166.

Larsen, S. M. (2017). Successful reentry through the eyes of female ex-offenders: A qualitative   study.

Ndrecka, M. (2014). The impact of reentry programs on recidivism: A meta-analysis (Doctoral    dissertation, University of Cincinnati).

Percy, W., Kostere, K., and Kostere, S. (2015). Generic qualitative research in psychology. The   Qualitative Report, 20(2), 76-85Kennedy, 2016

Rade, C. B., Desmarais, S. L., & Mitchell, R. E. (2016). A Meta-Analysis of Public Attitudes      Toward Ex-Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(9), 1260–1280. https://doi.org/         HYPERLINK "https://doi org.library.The.edu/10.1177/0093854816655837" 10.1177 /0093854816655837

Richards, K. R., & Hemphill, M. A. (2018). A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data      analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 225-231.            doi:10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084

Simon, M. (2011). The role of the researcher. Retrieved May21, 2016.

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; how to choose a sampling    technique for research. How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research (April 10,           2016).

William, A. (2015). Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews.  DOI 10.1002/9781119171386.ch19.

Yukhnenko, D., Blackwood, N., & Fazel, S. (2019). Risk factors for recidivism in individuals      receiving community sentences: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CNS Spectrums.             doi:10.1017/S1092852919001056

 

5965 Words  21 Pages
Get in Touch

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to inform us and we will gladly take care of it.

Email us at support@edudorm.com Discounts

LOGIN
Busy loading action
  Working. Please Wait...