Edudorm Facebook

Social disorganization Theory

            Applying Theory to Criminal Justice Events

The selected theory is social disorganization and the crime type to be analyzed by the criminal justice theory is robbery. Social disorganization is a theory that holds that an individual’s physical as well as social surroundings are mainly accountable for the behavioral options that an individual settles for (Bachman & Schutt, 2017). At the center of the theory, it asserts that one’s location is of great significance when predicting unlawful conduct. It is noted that in areas with the utmost criminal conduct there are at least several mutual issues such as poverty, bodily decay, and high diversity in regard to ethnicity and cultures (Miller, 2009). It is highly argued that the misbehavior in such surroundings is not as a result of individual’s will rather it is an ordinary reaction by ordinary persons to irregular pressures (Miller, 2009). Social disorganization is a theory that is mainly utilized in the analysis of forcefulness of crime that seems normal to certain areas.

Social disorganization can be utilized in analyzing robbery crimes in specified locations. This is because the theory asserts that deviant conduct is highly likely to occur in those communities where the responsible social institutions like schools, churches and justice systems fail in the application of resistor over the existing populace (Teasdale, 2016). Unlike all other theories, this theory is more focused on the surrounding rather than individual in its attempts to explain why certain locations normally experience more crimes when equated to others. Questionably, the efficiency of a specified community relies on the operative utilization of resources, abilities as well as authority in solving issues which result in enhancing the general life’s superiority in the quest of discouraging criminal actions (Teasdale, 2016).

Social disorganization theory, therefore, contends that due to failures in regard to networking capabilities and skills of organizations in certain communities, certain neighborhoods are bound to experience more crimes via a social mandate collapse and the absence of social policies obedience (Teasdale, 2016). Social disorganization theory is therefore suitable for analyzing robbery given that it is high in certain communities. In that for the most communities that are characterized by high levels of ethnic diversity and low socio-economic levels the rate of crimes is usually high based on the inefficiency that is experienced while attempting to control the populace. In addition, those areas are associated with high levels of unemployment and illiteracy levels which fuel delinquency development (Teasdale, 2016). In this context, the behaviors are not as a cause of individuals choices but are mainly influenced by environmental pressures.

Social disorganization is appropriate for analyzing robbery as a crime. This involves taking someone’s property with the intention of depriving by inserting fear or violence (Pratt, Gau, & Franklin, 2011). The fear of violence subjected via robbery can best be analyzed by the theory given that it is fueled by the surrounding. In areas where social norms are already broken this means that breaking laws becomes a norm among the populace. The theory is therefore appropriate for robbery analysis given that such behaviors are mainly fueled by poverty, unemployment and high levels of illiteracy which are higher in certain communities while not in others (Pratt, Gau, & Franklin, 2011). In this context, it can be stated that the socio-economic situation in this communities pushes the ordinary individuals to engage in irregular actions as a means of survival or living. It is the surrounding that shapes their behaviors in general rather than individuality.

 

 

References

Bachman, R., & Schutt, R. K. (2017). The practice of research in criminology and criminal         justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Miller, J. M. (2009). 21st century criminology: A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks, Calif:      Sage.

Pratt, T. C., Gau, J. M., & Franklin, T. W. (2011). Key ideas in criminology and criminal justice.             Los Angeles: SAGE.

Teasdale, B. (2016). Preventing crime and violence. Place of publication not identified: Springer             International Pu.

 

                                       

649 Words  2 Pages
Get in Touch

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to inform us and we will gladly take care of it.

Email us at support@edudorm.com Discounts

LOGIN
Busy loading action
  Working. Please Wait...