Edudorm Facebook

Social behavior theory

Social Behavior Theory

Introduction

Social behavior theory that was  proposed  by  Bandura Albert has grown to  be the  most  influential  concept  in  regard  to development  and learning.  The  theory  is grounded  on  different  basic traditional concepts  of learning  since Bandura held the belief  that  straight reinforcement  would not  consider  all  the  types  of learning. The theory is widely identified as an observational model that is utilized in the description of different human behaviors.  The theory has an added social component that argues that individuals can learn fresh behaviors and information by simply watching others (Akers, 2009).  The theory has been transformed into social learning rather than social behavior in the modern era.  Based on SLT, people   can learn behaviors via the observation of attitudes, outcomes as well as behaviors.  Precisely,  the theory  provides  explanations  regarding  human conduct  in  regard  to  continuous  and  mutual  interactions  amid behavioral, cognitive  and  environmental  influences.

Historical Background

Before the year 1960, the existing published theories regarding learning were mainly influenced by the assumptions of operant, psychoanalytic and classic conditioning conceptual drives.  The verabal behavior book of B.F Skinner was published in the year 1959 a critique by Chomsky Noam (Parrish, 2014). The criticism  made  the claim that direct stimulated  behavioral theories  failed to consider  the procedures  of  acquiring  language  and this  specific argument  made significant contributions  to the cognitive  revolution of psychology.

With  the  particular  context, Bandura Albert studied  the  process  of learning that took place  in interpersonal context  of learning and held no adequate explanations of the general concepts  in regard to social learning for example  Julian Rotter’s work (Akers, 2009). In particular,  Bandura made the argument that  learning approaches  weaknesses  that  mainly  discounts  social  variables  contribution were not soundly  and accurately presented in the concepts  of novel responses  acquisitions.  Fresh responses  acquisitions  according to  Skinner were based  on the  successive  approximation process  which necessitated  various  trials, behavioral  elements  strengthening and  gradual  transformation.  The theory  by Rotter therefore,  made the proposal the occurring likelihood  of a certain human  behavior  was  the  responsibility  of  subjective  expectation  and  reinforcement  value (Akers, 2009). The  approach  was an assumption  of the existing  responses  hierarchy and  therefore according to Bandura thus did not  make any  account  on the particular  responses which had not been  acquired yet.  Rapid acquisition study of novel conducts through human social observation was started at the moment by Bandura the famous one being the experiments that were being conducted on Bobo dolls. This developed the  conclusion  that  individuals are  capable  of learning  different  behaviors through  direct  and  mutual  observation  on others with the origination of SLT being based in 1977 (Akers, 2009).

Theorist

Bandura Albert was born in the year 1925 on the 4th of December (Akers, 2009). He can best  be described  as  an influential  psychologist  who for the last six  full decades  has been involved  in high  contributions to the education field as well as  psychological fields  that  involves therapy,  social  cognitive  as well as  personality  psychology (Schelbe, & Geiger, 2017).  His influence can additionally be traced from cognitive and behaviorism transition.  He  is  popular for being the  founder of  the  theory  of social  learning  and the  theoretical  development  of  self efficacy  who is additionally  responsible  for the popular and  influential  experiment developed in 1961 referred to as  Bobo doll (Schelbe, & Geiger, 2017). 

Initially Bandura was influenced by the work of Robert Sea on social behavior familial antecedents as well as learning identification (Schelbe, & Geiger, 2017).  His first research was particularly dedicated to social reproduction in the context of actions, thoughts as well as human motivation.  Alongside  with  his  colleague  and  his first  student  in the doctoral level Richard  Walters he  got into  the  learning  of aggression  and  social  learning.  The research  first  phase was involved  in the  analyzing of human  learning  foundations  as well as the  willingness of adults as well as  children in imitating  the  conducts  that  they  observe  from  others  and particularly  aggression (Schelbe, & Geiger, 2017).

Social Work Knowledge Base

In all the fields  social workers  are  faced  with  different  difficulties  and challenges  that  arrives with  trials  of understanding  the general behaviors  of human (Vito, 2006).  The ability  to  obtain  the  knowledge  can be categorized as a complex  and multi layered  procedure  that  requires social  workers  to  utilize  different theories  in  getting  positive effects  for the consumers one being  the  theory  of social  learning. A social worker  with increased  knowledge that relates to social learning  is  able to comprehensively  utilize  the  developed models  in resolving  behavioral  conflicts  despite the setting. Despite  the specialty in social work  problems and conflicts  faced in social working  are  developed  by  problematic behavioral  and  social  strengthening. For instance  the theory  can be utilized  in schools in understanding  issues  of bullying,  substance abuse, violence, school  attendance, poor  performance, student  socialization and psychological  issues. the  above  mentioned  issues  can be developed  by scenarios  which  are best  demonstrated  by SLT (Vito, 2006).

A consideration  of  social working in a school  setting  can be utilized  in understanding  problems that  relates  to aggressive  conduct  that  negatively  impacts  the  capability  of students to  learn (Vito, 2006). SLT can therefore , be applied  by in social work  in  evaluating  role approaches and the  incentive in which the  students are exposed to regularly  in that it would be the  strengthening  of aggression, disruptive conduct and a discourager  of positivity (Nicolson, 2014).  After the  identification  of the primary  cause  of the  negative  conduct  SLT can be utilized by the social  worker  in the  identification  of  dysfunctional  thoughts  pattern as  that  influences  the  behaviors and  emotions  of the  students (Vito, 2006).  Via the  utilization  of  therapy  gradual  approaches  like  positive  approaches, stress  management and systematic  desensitization  new  conducts  can be attained . This  can be accomplished  by transforming  the desirable  or  negative strengthening  that  is directly  related  with the incentive at the  base of the issue (Weiner, Millon & Lerner, 2003).

Description of the Theory

SLT is the perspective that individual acquires learning by making mutual observations on others.  The theory makes an explanation that acquiring fresh behaviors, attitudes and values can be based on observation.  Social  learning therefore necessitates  a high  degree  of concentration  to the individual being observed,  a remembrance of the  behavior that was  observed, the capability of replicating the  conduct and the  general  motivation  of acting in a similar  manner.  The theory  makes the  claim  that  individuals  acquires  learning  from  someone else through  observing, developing some imitations as well as modeling. The  theory  covers  the  gap that  lies amid  cognitive and  behaviorist  learning concepts  since  it covers  memory, motivation  as well as  attention (Newman, & Newman, 2012).

Individuals acquire learning via direct observation of other person’s outcomes, behaviors and attitudes (Krohn, Lizotte, & Hall, 2009).  This is to state that most behaviors that are depicted by humans are obtained from observing others. In that  from an observation  on other  people , one is able  to develop  thoughts on how  fresh  ideas  can be obtained  and  later the acquired  information is utilized  as a guide  in performing  the actual  actions (Krohn, Lizotte, & Hall, 2009).  SLT makes  an explanation  of human conduct  in  regard to mutual and  consistent  association  amid behavioral,  environmental  and cognitive  influences.  The theory is grounded on four principles which are attention, motivation, reproduction and retention. According to Bandura, reciprocal determinism which is the surrounded as well as the general behavior cause of an individual to the other. Bandura made  the  claim that  personality  is  developed  from the  incorporation  of behavior, environment and  an individual’s  psychological procedures which is the  general capability of entertaining  visuals  in language  and minds (Hepworth, 2010).

Based on the attention principle different factors decreases or rises the degree of attention that is paid.  This includes prevalence, distinctiveness, complexity, functional value and affective valence. This implies that an individual may not acquire any learning if they are not alert on the specific task (Greene, 2008).  Observation of uniqueness gathers an individual’s attention which is reinforced by social context.  The ability to recall the concept that was being observed is explained by retention which may involve symbolic coding, mental visuals, cognitive arrangement and motor rehearsal. Through the internalization  of  the stored data in the memory  the  information  can be regained  in responding to  similar situations that  surrounds  the  information  that was learned.  In the context of reproduction, individuals will obviously reproduce the information that was acquired before such as knowledge, skills as well as behaviors. However, the general practice via physical and mental exercise normally develops responses.  This is the sector where images are reproduced that incorporates physical abilities as well as self observations.  Motivation  implies  to holding  a viable  rationale  of imitating which may be  motivated  by the  past, vicarious  and  the  promised (Haffer, 2009).

Major Terms

The major terms regarding the theory of social behavior are reciprocal modeling, retention, attention, reproduction and motivation.  In that  in order for an individual  to acquire any form of  social  behavior  they  must  make  mutual observation  on the  desired activity, value, attitude or even behavior which is  regarded as the reciprocal  determinant (Engler, 2008). In addition focus or attention is required while observing so that vivid images can be developed regarding the conduct. The  ability  to  continuously recall the  information  when required in similar situation  is called  reproduction which cannot be attained without  being  focused.  In addition  retention  is the general  capability  held by an  individual  in  retaining  the information  that  they were  able  to acquire  and  regain it  when it is needed.  Motivation is the justifiable rationale behind the general desire to imitate or rather copy (Gambrill, 2006). 
            Major Assumptions

Social behavior is a theory that is grounded on a variety of assumptions. First, individuals are able to acquire learning on making observations on others outcomes as well as behaviors (Carducci, 2006). Learning can take place even without the transformation of behavior and cognitive plays a significant role in it.  In addition the theory states that individuals have the ability to control their surrounding and actions.  This is accomplished  through  self regulation and human’s nature  can be regarded  as  social  and thus  and this means that  people are  active  in imitating experiences (Brandell, 2011).
            Conclusion

The theory of social learning can be categorized as the study of persons, conducts and the surrounding which are directly related.  It can be established that the theory of social behavior is more comprehensive as compared to the behaviorist perspective.  Individuals make effective learning through reciprocal observation by attention, retention, motivation as well as reproduction. This implies that in order for social learning to occur one must be able to observe attentively, recall the information, utilize it when needed and have a solid motivation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            References

Akers, R. L. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. New Brunswick [N.J.: Transaction Publishers.

Brandell, J. R. (2011). Theory & practice in clinical social work. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Carducci, B. J. (2006). The psychology of personality. Oxford: Blackwell.

Engler, B. (2008). Personality theories: An introduction. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Gambrill, E. D. (2006). Social work practice: A critical thinker's guide. New York: Oxford University Press.

Greene, R. R. (2008). Human behavior theory & social work practice. New Brunswick, N.J: AldineTransaction.

Haffer, D. R. (2009). Social and personality development. Cengage Learning.

Hepworth, D. H. (2010). Direct social work practice: Theory and skills. Belmont, Calif: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.

Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., & Hall, G. P. (2009). Handbook on crime and deviance. Dordrecht: Springer.

Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2012). Development through life: A psychosocial approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Nicolson, P. (2014). Psychology for Social Work Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.

Parrish, M. (2014). Social Work Perspectives On Human Behaviour. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.

Schelbe, L., & Geiger, J. M. (2017). Intergenerational transmission of child maltreatment. Springer.

Vito, G. F. (2006). Criminology. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Weiner, I. B., Millon, T., & Lerner, M. J. (2003). Handbook of psychology: Vol. 5. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

1995 Words  7 Pages
Get in Touch

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to inform us and we will gladly take care of it.

Email us at support@edudorm.com Discounts

LOGIN
Busy loading action
  Working. Please Wait...