Science vs. religion and the influence on human history

Science is the knowledge that is acquired by a human being from experiment and observation so as to bring the proof of early human history. On the other hand, religion is set of beliefs in the human being concerning the cause, purpose and the nature of the universe without experiment and observation acquired which contain moral affairs of human conduct. Both science and religion contain the information of the human history whereby they are all giving out the explanation without enough evidence. Some of these theories of early human history that are conducted by the science and the religion are positive and others are negative. Religion and science both are aiming to engage the human origin of the scientific presentation. This paper is focusing on science and religion as well as their influence on human history.

According to Collins (1999) in the current technology, it has permit Scientific to gather the information from various sources and a high advance level along with the view of particles that make up the world. Religion has gathered the information of human history from cultural phenomena which comprises of sacred texts, literature, the practice of traditions, and sacred places among others that convey the ultimate meaning as well as transmitting an understanding of the human history. Early human history and globalization are influenced by both religion and science in such case unity and religious faith amongst the men has a strong belief that there is God but the Scientific have bombarded the human being belief by proclaiming that there is no God and no need of believing the religion. The reason for both the science and religion are manipulating the early human history is because they are both looking for the truth, for this reason, science and religion are considered to influence the early human history and globalization.

Although both religion and science have historical traditions that exhibit development over time in the early human history, conflict between the two schools of thoughts have existed since they are competing hence bringing the manipulation in the globalization. Dismissed of the truth from the science and religion have exists since none of the school is accepting the truth of the early human history which tend to bring manipulation of the human history and globalization. For instance, religion is claiming no need to believe the science because is distorted and abandoned. Conversely, science is claiming not to believe in religion history of early human history because religious are neither doing experiment nor observation hence both schools tends to bring conflict which makes human history and globalization being influenced (Draper, 1875).

The influence that has being brought by the science and religion toward the early human history and globalization is the confirmation within the both school of thought. Religion was understood in the terms of its own natural existence before the Aristotelians but it was later bombarded by the science which makes human beings lose the belief of the religion. This attitude has tended to the separation of the unification of the science discovery and religion belief. Through the religion, beliefs were claimed true in the previous philosophy upon the examining reliant. Science starts performing ancient doctorate of surgeries and medical practices which are claimed to bring the aspects of the purpose of human race. The science and religion are influencing the globalization and early human history in through separation (Malone, 2009).

Science and religion have influenced the globalization and the early human history by the interaction. Interaction has brought a view of religion and science value for the reason given that, science and religion can be more constructive through the engagement benefit which can make both schools of thought bring envisions of convergence and perspectives. This view is generally encouraging human being to explore the significance of religion understanding and science understanding and the vice versa. For instance, the human being may ignore the finding of science if they are interacting by visiting the museum of which science remains relevant beyond the museum for this reason human history and globalization tend to be manipulated by the two schools of thought (Miller, 1999).

Religion and science can clash because without religion there is no science this is implied by the literature. The science main foundation of early human history is based on technology whereby science relies completely on the evidence whereas religion is based on conjecture and faith. Religion and science cannot coexist because between these two schools are bringing conflict which makes other people even not to believe about them hence this can show the evidence of clashing rather than coexisting. Although science is not against God but it also implies on there is no God existing because by scientific experiments and observation it only proof no God existing in the early human history.  On the other hand, religion is implying there is the existence of God because of their strong faith which can make science and religion to clash at the end because of bringing separation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Miller, K., 1999, Finding Darwin's God. New York: Harper-Collins.

Draper, J. W., 1875, History of the Conflict between Religion and Science. New York: D. Appleton and Co., 5th ed.

Malone, J. (2009). Psychology: Pythagoras to present. MIT Press Cambridge: MA

Collins, R. (1999).A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God: The Fine-Tuning Design Argument Neil Manson (ed.) New York: Routledge