BUSINESS LAW
Case number: 2001-A-0078
Date: November 22, 2002
In this case, the appellant, Paine Funeral Home ended up appealing from the final judgment concerning the affirming of the decision that was made by the appellee. According to the court reasoning, the appellee was the board of embalmers as well as the Ohio funeral directors that had initially suspended the provision of the burial permit for a period of six months. It should be realized that this are some of the accelerated schedule appeals that are believed to be submitted to the judicial court just because of convictions of their parties (Crawford, 2011).
As a result of that, it evident that management authority of the organization, especially, Vaughn Paine ended up being changed with the offense of participating in funeral businesses. The reason for that is because he had not initially acquired a credited license. According to the information that was provided, the director had ordered someone to falsify signatures of the deceased ones (Goldberg et al., 2016). As a result of that the court was later ordered or forced to suspend the provision of such documents. This is because such an organization was perceived to have the ability of committing immoral or engaging in unprofessional hospital behaviors. Ideally, understanding the working permit of a person is the one that has the ability of enabling such individuals to work ethically (Crawford, 2011).
On the other hand, although the court could have managed to have the ability of modifying the general hearing, it was important for them to take into account the recommendations that were provided by the funeral organization. It is, therefore, evident that the ongoing analysis of the appellant’s information was the one to give the clear rationale of the prevailing case (Goldberg et al., 2016).
References
Crawford, R. N.-C. W. H. N. P. (2011). Legal Deception: The story of the grisly discovery of mosre than 300 desecrated bodies and that lies that followed. Cork: BookBaby
Goldberg, J. C. P., Sebok, A. J., & Zipursky, B. C. (2016). Tort law: Responsibilities and redress. New York : Wolters Kluwer
