Unintentional tort

From my understanding of the unintentional tort, bob’s injury resulted from his negligence. He did not intend to break the trespass rule because he had seen others pass through the route before. In addition, the school had not put up a warning against trespassing. The harm that befalls on him nevertheless results as an accident which no one could be liable over it except himself. The school management is therefore justified to accuse Bob for failing to use his common senses because if he had considered using them, the accident would not have victimized him. The blame automatically falls of Bob for having trespassed without considering any possible consequence.

Various companies usually have a trade mark and a slogan.

Google for instance is the most worth trademark in the world and its slogan is “Don’t be evil”.

Microsoft’s trademark is also powerful and its slogan is “Be What’s Next”.

Lastly the trademark of Walmart is entitled “Save money live better”

 

 

In my opinion, slogans are useful because they can easily be remembered. Most people treasure quotes and slogans and therefore their play a significant role in improving the brand’s recognition.

Responses on chapter 5

It is correct that an act can be legal but unethical at the same time. The example of Pharma Company’s incidence reflects exactly what it means to be ethically wrong but legally right. The example of Blakely also supports the claim and from these instances, judges apply the legal law to decide on who is guilty and who is not.

Response on chapter 6

The explanation is eligible because it precisely answers the question exactly how I would have answered. Road rage is in fact a criminal offence and the punishment should be based on breaking the rules of safety. It is true that the most effective way to prevent road rage is through the observance of safety rules. Penalties on careless drivers could also prevent but the most efficient is through educating the drivers on the need to observe safety rules.