Myers Briggs Type Indicator Test

The use of Myers Briggs Type Indicator Test to Determine Personality Types
On her article, Strauss highlights basic theoretical moments of Myers Briggs Type Indicator test together with its strengths and weaknesses. People have different personality types that make them different from the rest of the population. Over the years, many tests have been invented, to help people understand their personalities. One such test is the Myers Briggs Type Indicator test by Katharine and Isabel Briggs. The test is accurate, but how accurate it is, is subject to scrutiny. Illana Strauss in the article, “soul searching through the Myers-Briggs Test”, explores this issue. Writers who offer psychology assignment help at Edudorm essay writing service notes that to let her audience have a better understanding of the topic, the author quotes various scientists that have studied this test. She presents her arguments objectively citing reasons why the test gives credible results. She however, points out that the test should be applied cautiously to determine personality types. This paper explores how the author argues out her points and comes to a conclusion.
The author begins by quoting research done by credible sources on the Myers Briggs Type Indicator test and its accuracy. She focuses the reader’s attention on the importance of taking Myers Briggs Type Indicator test. She also provides the reader with a short overview of the main characteristics of the test together with its positive and negative views. However, she maintains neutrality as she points out research for and against the Myers Briggs Type Indicator test. This allows readers ample space to analyze the matter critically without being inclined to either support or oppose the claims presented. Experts who offer psychology essay help at Edudorm essay writing service indicates that she focuses on unequivocal results of the tests and supports them by the fact that people with the same results of Myers Briggs Type Indicator test, who belong to the same personality types, have similar behavior models. Furthermore, she adds that these people tend to understand each other better. They also tend to find common interests more easily since they have similar life priorities, system of values, features of character, and specifics of mindset (Strauss 4)
The author also uses other techniques to help pass her points across when addressing the topic of Myers Briggs Type Indicator test. She uses a first person narrative in order to shorten the distance between author and reader. Applying personal experience is an efficient method to make reading more conscious. This is because people prefer trusting other people instead of blindly following bare facts. Besides, the structure of the article is also thoroughly prepared, as the text is divided into five parts, which makes the comprehension of the writing easier. All of the five parts vary in the messages passed across; for instance, the first part is an introductory one. The second part comes closer to the core of the issue, accenting reader’s attention at a real-life experience of the author. Authors who offer social science essay help at Edudorm essay writing service points that the third part refers to the positions of Leon Sao, that provided a detailed description of how people with different personality types interact with each other, share emotions and feelings, and even have the same problems in establishing relations with their family members or coworkers (Strauss 6). The fourth part develops a thesis about common conflicts between different personality types while referring to the positions of Manju Pradhan and his invaluable experience in counseling psychology. According to Pradhan, every personality type has its own set of features that are absolutely normal but may be perceived as inadequate by other personality types (Strauss 8). In the fifth part, the author comes to a conclusion, that, despite the complicated nature and controversial character of Myers Briggs Type Indicator test, it helps in self-discovery; it enables one to better understand the inner and external world (Strauss 10).
However, it is factual that the way Strauss introduces the topic in her article is not fit for the audience that is completely unaware of what the topic is all about. Precisely, starting with a real life example increases the possibility of the reader to be lost. Though the reader will understand later what the topic is all about, it is undeniable that it will oblige him/her to re-read again to fully understand the idea. Additionally, the way Strauss introduced Myers Briggs Type Indicator test after the example is absolutely misleading to the reader. Strauss could have started with defining MBTI as a type of personality test before using a real life example of how personality test applies and operates. Tutors who offer MBA essay writing service at Edudorm acknowledges that it is noteworthy that the flow of the content ought to be compatible with the understanding of the reader. In this case, the reader understands the example that Strauss had given in the prologue after she introduces Myers Briggs Type Indicator test. The other misleading technique used by Strauss in this article is to keep referring to the example she drew in the prologue to reinforce her point in the middle of the article. It is true that this enhances the understanding of the reader but it is appropriate to keep both the example and the explanation together in order to effectuate the process of deriving her points. Generally, it can be asserted that the article is perfect for the audience that is well acquainted with the topic.
In conclusion, this article serves its intended purpose; the author carefully cites arguments toward and against the use of Myers Briggs Type Indicator test in determining personality traits and in the end gives her stand on the issue. Mentors who offer descriptive essay help at Edudorm essay writing service recognizes that she uses various techniques to ensure that she connects with different audiences, which includes; providing scientific based evidence, using simple language and also drawing examples from her own experiences. According to the article Myers Briggs Type Indicator test are reliable but just like all scientific tests, is not 100% effective; therefore, Strauss advices readers to employ the test critically and objectively.
Works Cited
Strauss, Ilana E. “Soul Searching Through the Myers-Briggs Test.” The Atlantic., 16 Sept. 2015.P11