Morality of Euthanasia
Morality of Euthanasia and Ethics
The controversies surrounding morality of euthanasia and the end of life desires is usually tangled with three conditions. When one has intense pain, terminally ill and a voluntary case to end one’s life due to lengthy suffering. Death can be brought in different ways for example in an end life situation. Writers who do my homework for me at Edudorm essay writing service notes that suicide is when an individual decides to take away his life which can be due to reasons such as mental health problems but consequently nothing tragic. Ethically it is challenging to determine which form of death is acceptable from the unacceptable assistance measures (Rae, 63).
Morality of Euthanasia in Christian Perspective
According to Christian philosophers, there are moral controversies surrounding morality of euthanasia as suicide is considered as a duty of God as it lies within him to pronounce the sentence of life and death (Rae, 67). Normal human activities involve the purpose of the physical world as they are expected to live that way. Experts who offer homework answers at Edudorm essay writing service indicates that other philosophers argue that our physical bodies are for our own purpose and there is no crime in suicide as it would also be wrong to lengthen our lives through the use of medicine. To end a life is a horrible situation but it is not only viewed to be morally permissible to take away my life but also praiseworthy as it is seen not to overburden others or drain the financial resources that are required to take care of an ill person.
Suicide and Morality of Euthanasia
On the other side, morality of euthanasia through suicide goes against the duties of others. This is because it causes social harm as it violets the responsibility of the society. Every member belongs to the community and by taking away a life the community is injured. Authors who offer college homework help at Edudorm essay writing service points that the principle rule of morality is there should be no suicide regardless of the condition as it degrades the human nature way below to the animal level. There is no justification for morality of euthanasia as there is a great inherent value that is not replaceable to human life (Rae, 104). It might be easy to abandon personal freedom and choose own destiny to end an individual life but it morally competes with the interest of God and others.
Morality of Euthanasia in Assisted Death
Morality of euthanasia means good death which can be translated to be a mercy killing (Mattison, 375). When a third party performs an act of ending someone’s life such as a doctor in a clinical setting is considered as active euthanasia. Passive morality of euthanasia is when death takes place without third party interference. Tutors who offer discussion board homework help at Edudorm essay writing service acknowledges that the neurological theory states that brain death institutes real death in the view that death befalls to a person when they fail to engage in the surrounding environment hence brain death. There are difficulties of finding the boundaries that surround life and death as the means used cannot justify the general honor of the body instead of basing it on the disorder of the brain. Palliative care which is related with hospice platforms purposes at minimizing the anguish through pain medication to the dying patients (Mattison, 379). These programs do not assist any death of active euthanasia as it aims at refining the dying patients during their last days.
Conclusion
In a society setting it is considered morally wrong to end a life. It is considered to be the duty of God as He gives life and takes it away. Mentors who do my homework at Edudorm essay writing service recognizes that most individuals will not lend a helping hand to the other members of the community to facilitate them in taking away their lives but they would rather wait for it to happen naturally. In a clinical setting, it seems morality of euthanasia is right to facilitate the process of ending life as it is seen to be the best decision considering the pain these individuals goes through.
Work cited
Mattison, William C. I. I. I. Introducing Moral Theology: True Happiness and the Virtues. Grand Rapids: Baker Pub. Group, 2008. Internet resource.375
Rae, Scott B. Moral Choices: An Introduction to Ethics. Grand Rapids, Mich: Zondervan, 2009. Print.-67
