Waiting for Superman Movie
Waiting for Superman Movie Analysis
The creator of the Waiting for Superman movie starts with the ramifications of the act that no teenager should be trail behind and he goes into dipper to the number of the students who are good in mathematics, proficient in interpretation and how their marks consequently overwhelm the students when the test are done (Guggenheim , 00:18:26). Even though the creator of Waiting for Superman movie did not bring into perspective the achieved progress in district schools and how students in charter schools are proficient in the same subject Guggenheim is able to focus on the achievements of the students entering in college and the graduation rates. In Waiting for Superman movie, Guggenheim pushes on with the idea standard testing without making a definite opposition except condemning the different strategies and standards set in each state for proficiency. In this Waiting for Superman movie, Guggenheim uses statistics and facts in order to prove his message. Writers who offer analysis essay help at Edudorm writing service notes that Guggenheim has included background stories of the five children parents and their experience with education. Moreover, he addresses the dropout factories which the audience could relate to. As a way of creating emotions Guggenheim used his own experience of dropout factories as a way of demonstrating the severe consequences of attending public schools before 1970. As a way of proving his theory right, Guggenheim uses Bill Strickland who is an education reformer and other five children who have the hope of being accepted in charter schools as it is seen to be the only option for them to improve their condition (Guggenheim, 00:23:42). The demonstration by Guggenheim for the viewers displays the pressure of being capable of having their children attend schools that will change their future rather than have the future determined by a district school.
Concept of Waiting for Superman Movie
Throughout the Waiting for Superman movie Geoffrey Canada, the speaker shares the views that superman did not exist and broke his heart but did inspire him to devote his life to helping the underprivileged. Canada has been used as a strategy by Guggenheim to be able to capture the viewers because he is addressing the issue they have an interest in. By saying that teachers union in public schools is disastrous to a child’s education Guggenheim displays that unions are not beneficial to students and are only applicable to adults. He has raised the concern that the things they have done to help the schools they are the same things hindering them to work. Guggenheim emphasizes that teachers unions should be used to help students and directing them in during their school years but instead the unions are only enhancing the teachers’ career whether good or bad. By using the fact of tenure in Waiting for Superman movie, Guggenheim argues that it is only used the job for a teacher for three years in a row regardless of whether they are good or path. This is emotional striking as it clearly shows that only the needs of a teacher are placed before that of shaping the students future (Guggenheim, 26:55). It is harmful to the children education as there are improper ways of dealing with the students which have been statistically proven that one in every 2500 teachers do lose their teaching credentials (Guggenheim, 30:50). Experts who make my essay at Edudorm writing service indicates that the facts, misleading, incomplete statistics and the unsupported claims Guggenheim greatest sin is that of omission as there is no voice of a single teacher to offer side of their story. Guggenheim seems to disagree by describing families with children in charter schools are committed to their education while those in district schools belong of a wrecked system.
At the end of Waiting for Superman movie, Guggenheim places the views in the same shoes as the five children in the lottery so that they can share the same disappointment with the children who have the hope of joining charter schools (Guggenheim, 1:29:40). By this, he capitalizes on the hope and the fears of these families. The disappointment evokes emotion not only to the students but the parents and the viewers as well due to the inability to give them a proper education that can have a positive impact on their lives. The countdown in the lottery exerts more pressure and hope to the students and shows how difficult it is four out of the five students are denied a chance to enroll in charter schools (Guggenheim, 01:35:16). Authors who offer essay writing guide at Edudorm essay writing service points that this means that right decisions should be made so that the students of tomorrow may have a future. While Guggenheim focuses on the melodrama in waiting for Superman movie the, viewers feel that they are emotionally manipulated as children have been maliciously deceived by putting their unrestricted faith in private schools which they had hoped to join only to be turned away.
Conclusion
In Waiting for Superman movie, Guggenheim has been able to patronize the audience by signifying that matters of learning are complicated but now the answers are available. By excluding a vast majority of teacher’s parents and students he has been able to portray a negative side of the district schools in America education system. The right decision should be made so that even the public schools can shape the future of their students by also encouraging parents to be part of their children education system rather than viewing them as part of a broken system as it would be precious time lost waiting.
Work cited
Guggenheim Davis. (2016). Waiting for Superman movie.
