Original earth creation
Introduction about original earth creation
The topic covered in this comparative essay involves the original earth creation and the Earth’s age. This paper aims at providing a comparison on the topic from the Nebular Hypothesis viewpoint or the secular view of the old earth and Six-Day Creation viewpoint or the view of the Young-Earth. The discussion, thus, focuses on the two views affect how the age of the Earth is perceived.
The old Earth secular perspective on Original Earth Creation
This view is explained from the Nebular Hypothesis’ propositions that the earth, sun and rest parts of solar system were formed from a nebula, which is a cloud of gas and dust. This Hypothesis holds that a cloud of gas and dust, which is collapsed by gravity, begins to spin quickly due to the conservation of the angular momentum. It further explains that from this cloud, the earth and the other solar systems were formed. The cloud majorly consisted of hydrogen, helium and some amounts of chemical elements that are naturally occurring. The materials that made up the old earth were most likely added piecemeal having no specific order. The early earth extremely hot due to impacts, gravitational compression and radioactive decay than it is currently. It was most likely mostly or largely molten (Brush, 1996). In addition, the formation earth’s crust eventually happened due to the intrusive and volcanic activities. The hypothesis holds that the continental crust which is most rich in silica and least dense had been formed in the past 2.5 billion years. Writers who offer history research paper help at Edudorm essay writing service notes that indications from the planetary formation numerical simulations by use of the nebular hypothesis shows the whole process of rotation, contraction, proto-sun formation and planets accretion may have taken place within the past 100 million years. The hypothesis generally holds that the earth is at least 4.56 years old (Columbia University, n.d).
The Young Earth Perspective on original earth creation
The view point of a young earth is explored from the perspective six- day’s creation based in the Old Testament section of the bible. The creation week in the book of Genesis is taken literally to mean 24-hours periods which add up to 6 days of the calendar. Giving allowance for the gaps in the genealogies of the Old Testament, it means that the creation of the universe took place at least the past 6,000 years ago. The young earth creationism proposes that geological data which consist of the fossil record should be comprehended from the perspective of the flood showed in the account of Noah and his ark that covered the whole world. Thus, the Young Earth interpretation of the original earth creation is quite straight forward. It holds that the book of Genesis should be considered as a historical record that is simple and having no symbolism or metaphor. The length of everyday is equal to the length of other days found throughout the bible (Koperski, 2006). Experts who offer history assignment help at Edudorm essay writing service indicates that the young earth creationism holds the incident Noachian flood to be worldwide. If a reinterpretation is allowed, that is of Genesis with an old earth with animals having died prior to the fall is a blow to the Christianity, Judaism and Islamic doctrine. Therefore any scientific explanation like the Nebula Hypothesis that requires extreme age can be interpreted in terms of a very recent creation. To explain the issue of distant stars being seen if the earth is such young, the idea that recent creation possess “The Appearance of Age” is to some extent held in agreement by the young earth creationist (Numbers, 1993).
Comparison of the viewpoints about original earth creation
Though the old earth view and the young earth view have divergent positions on the original earth creation, there seems to be some few similarities. Authors who offer history essay help at Edudorm essay writing service points that the six day creation and nebular Hypothesis converge at the point where the formation of the earth was originally form formless masses of materials. The book of Genesis states that the earth was formless and covered in darkness while the Nebular Hypothesis holds that the formation resulted from the clouds of dust and gases which basically are not described as being in any form. Therefore, everything resulting from this creation is represented as being new meaning having no prior existence.
Contrasting the viewpoints about original earth creation
The differences between the six days creation and the Nebular Hypothesis can be explained in terms of the earth formation and its age. The young earth creation holds that the earth was created by God within 6 literal days and it is at least 6,000 years old. Moreover, it holds that there must be other explanations on the issues such as why the stars are seen from the earth and the speed of light. Any geological information, it states, should be viewed from Noachian flood perspective (Koperski, 2006). On the other hand, the Nebular Hypothesis old earth holds that the original earth creation formed from a cloud of gases and dust due to collapse of gravity . It holds the age of the earth to be at least 4.6 billion years of age (Columbia University, n.d). It disregards the Noah’s flood as a myth since genetic and geological contradict with it.
Conclusion
The debate about the original earth creation seems to be more about the trustworthiness of various sources rather than scripture – science conflict. The Nebular theory brings a direct challenge to the six day creation. The young earth theory is based more on a creation by superior power while old earth is founded on theories. There seems to be more divergent views with little comparison about the two perspectives on the original earth creation and age of the earth.
References
Brush, S. G. (1996). Nebulous earth: The origin of the solar system and the core of the earth from Laplace to Jeffreys. Cambridge [u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Numbers, R. L. (1993). The creationists: The evolution of scientific creationism. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Columbia University (n.d).The Solar Nebula. Formation of the Earth: Origin of the Atmosphere and Ocean Atmosphere and Oceans.
Koperski, J. (2006). Creationism: From Science, Religion, and Society: History, Culture, and Controversy, Gary Laderman and Arri Eisen, eds. Armonk, NY: Sharpe Reference. Retrieved from:
